Traditional Jewish folklore describes the dybbuk as a lost, tormented soul that attaches to a living person to achieve a goal (e.g., vengeance or completion). In The Possession , the dybbuk has no coherent backstory—its goal is simply to destroy the host’s family. Significantly, the entity first manifests violently when Clyde attempts to enforce a custody schedule (taking Emily for the weekend). The spirit’s attacks peak whenever the parents argue or when Emily is forced to choose between them.
The central artifact—the dybbuk box (based on the real “Dibbuk Box” sold on eBay in 2003)—serves as a powerful material metaphor. In the film, Clyde and Stephanie have divided their household: Clyde keeps a new apartment; Stephanie retains the family home. The box is discovered at a yard sale, a liminal space of discarded possessions and broken transactions. Emily, the middle child caught in the custody crossfire, is drawn to the box because it promises secrecy and containment—qualities her life lacks. The Possession -2012-2012
Nevertheless, this dynamic serves the divorce allegory. The gerush exorcism requires the entire family to be present and to confess their sins against one another. In a key scene, Tzadok forces Clyde to admit that he was unfaithful (the implied cause of the divorce) while the dybbuk speaks through Emily. The exorcism succeeds not through holy water or crucifixes but through the restoration of familial unity and truth-telling. The dybbuk is expelled only when the parents stop fighting and hold Emily together—a literal act of shared custody. The horror concludes when the family, broken but reunited, watches the box burn. The message is clear: the demon of divorce cannot be fought individually; it requires communal ritual and accountability. Traditional Jewish folklore describes the dybbuk as a
A controversial aspect of The Possession is its use of Orthodox Jewish ritual as a source of horror and salvation. The film employs Rabbi Wyne as a consultant, lending authenticity to the exorcism scene (which includes the blowing of a shofar , recitation of Psalm 91, and the burning of a white candle). However, the film also participates in a problematic trope: the “ethnic expert” who must rescue the ignorant white Protestant family. Clyde, a non-practicing Christian, must submit to Hasidic authority—a narrative that reinforces the exoticism of Jewish mysticism for mainstream audiences. The spirit’s attacks peak whenever the parents argue