Serial Key Dust Settle (2024)

[ D(t) = D_KL(P_t(K_U) \parallel U_\textvalid) ]

where the time constant ( \tau = \fracN_\textvalid2 ) in the worst-case adversarial strategy (systematic enumeration without replacement), and ( \tau = N_\textvalid / \ln 2 ) for average random guessing. serial key dust settle

[ D(t) = D(0) \cdot e^-t / \tau ]

[ H(K | K_P) = |U| \log_2 32 ]

After each partial disclosure, the remaining unknown "dust" of the key—the unresolved characters—experiences a transient period where the probability distribution over possible completions is non-uniform. We define the "dust settling" as the moment when this distribution becomes statistically indistinguishable from uniform (maximum entropy) given the known constraints. [ D(t) = D_KL(P_t(K_U) \parallel U_\textvalid) ] where

No prior work has quantified how long (in terms of computational steps or guesses) it takes for this dust to settle. This paper fills that gap. 2. Formal Model 2.1 Key Representation Let a serial key be a string ( K = k_1 k_2 \ldots k_n ) where each ( k_i \in \Sigma ), ( |\Sigma| = 32 ) (alphanumeric excluding ambiguous chars). Total keyspace size ( N = 32^n ). 2.2 Partial Disclosure Event An attacker learns a set of positions ( P \subset 1,\ldots,n ) and their values. Let ( U = 1,\ldots,n \setminus P ) be the unknown positions. Before any attack, entropy ( H(K) = n \log_2 32 ). After disclosure, conditional entropy: No prior work has quantified how long (in