Remember the 2019 case of the man who pretended to be a "God" to assault his daughter-in-law? The court convicted him under this clause. However, a lower court created a massive uproar when it ruled that a man who lied about his ability to provide a visa did not commit rape because the physical act was consensual (the infamous 2019 Karnataka High Court ruling).
While there are ongoing landmark petitions in the Supreme Court to strike down this exception, it remains a glaring blind spot. As of today, marital rape is a criminal offense in India. This single exception has sparked more debate than almost any other part of the IPC. What the Media Gets Wrong You often see headlines screaming about the "loopholes" in Section 375. The most common misunderstanding revolves around "consent obtained by fraud."
Whether you are a student, a parent, or a professional, understanding Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) [now reorganized under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 as Section 63] is not optional. It is essential for understanding your rights, the consent of your partner, and the landscape of justice in modern India.
That is a dangerous misconception.
In a country where dating apps are ubiquitous, where live-in relationships are common, and where "stealthing" (removing a condom without consent) is becoming a legal issue, the principles of Section 375 are more relevant than ever. Consent is not a one-time stamp. It is an enthusiastic, continuous, and revocable "yes." Don't let the legal number intimidate you. Section 375 is simply society's formal agreement on one fundamental truth: Your body belongs to you.
It’s not just a number. It’s the legal spine of sexual assault justice in India.
Yes, you read that correctly. If you are a married woman over the age of 15 (originally 18, but the law literally says 15—showing its age), the law historically does not recognize forced sex by your husband as rape. Section 375
Beyond the Headlines: Why Every Indian Needs to Understand Section 375
"Sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under fifteen years of age, is not rape."
Read the law. Know your rights. And until the marital rape exception is struck down, fight for those who are still invisible under this code. Remember the 2019 case of the man who
Whether it is a stranger in a park, a boyfriend in a car, a religious leader in an ashram, or a husband in a bedroom—the presence of "will, consent, and understanding" is the only thing that separates a legal act from a crime.
But the core battle remains the same:
The public raged: "Is lying about a visa not fraud?" While there are ongoing landmark petitions in the